.
Feedback

LIRR Extends Waiting Room Hours at 41 Stations

Extended hours resulted from collaborative effort between the railroad and LIRR Commuters Council.

The MTA Long Island Rail Road was joined by the LIRR Commuters Council Wednesday in announcing a pilot program to expand the hours of some of the railroads' station waiting rooms. 

The LIRR is extending the waiting room hours at 41 stations as part of its ongoing effort to improve customer service and in response to concerns raised by LIRR Commuter Council, which pressed for later afternoon and evening access to station facilities on behalf of customers.

The 41 stations will have their waiting room hours extended until 10 p.m. in the evening on weekdays. LIRR station waiting rooms typically open between 5 a.m. and 6 a.m. on weekdays. Prior to the pilot, most station waiting rooms closed by mid-afternoon.

“By expanding the waiting room hours in this pilot program, we are looking to provide an added level of customer service,” LIRR President Helena Williams said. “We realize that our customers are traveling our system at all hours of the day. By making the waiting rooms available for greater periods, customers have the convenience of waiting for trains out of the elements. We’ve been working closely with the LIRR Commuter Council on this issue and we appreciate their input.”

Earlier this year in a pilot program, the LIRR extended waiting room hours until 10 p.m. on weekdays at 20 stations. Those stations included: Bellerose, Bethpage, Brentwood, Douglaston, Farmingdale, Great Neck, Kings Park, Little Neck, Lynbrook, Merrick, Mineola, Oakdale, Oceanside, Patchogue, Roslyn, Sayville, Stony Brook, Valley Stream, Wantagh and Woodmere.

The LIRR closely monitored conditions at these 20 stations and determined that the extended hours did not result in significant additional cleaning or vandalism issues, allowing the pilot to be expanded.

The LIRR is now expanding this pilot program to include an additional 21 stations – bringing the total number of stations to 41. The additional stations include: Baldwin, Broadway, Cedarhurst, Central Islip, East Hampton, Floral Park, Forest Hills, Greenlawn, Island Park, Kew Gardens, Lindenhurst, Northport, Queens Village, Rockville Centre, Ronkonkoma, Rosedale, Sea Cliff, Seaford, Smithtown, St. James and Westbury. 

The LIRR will carefully monitor and assess the impact of extending the waiting room hours as the pilot program enters its second phase and may modify or end the program at particular stations, if circumstances warrant. 

All station waiting rooms involved in the pilot program (with the exception of Ronkonkoma) have automated locks to open and close the waiting room doors. As is currently the practice at waiting rooms with automated locks, approximately five minutes prior to the scheduled closing time, an automated announcement is made in the waiting room to alert occupants that the doors will be locking to allow sufficient time to exit.

Detectors within the waiting rooms alert the LIRR’s security department if someone remains in the waiting room once the doors are locked.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law