.
Feedback

"Love for Long Island" Donates Over $360 for Relief

North Carolina family's ribbon sales helping to get Babylon families on their feet.

A couple of young children from a place not-so-close to home are helping to get Long Islanders, especially those here in Babylon Village and West Babylon, some relief in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy.

Kirsten and Jack Reilly, siblings from Waxham, North Carolina, started their own fundraising campaign to help families here in the Babylon area, where their mother Kerri lived and previously worked as a teacher.

The children began selling ribbons to wrap around trees, much like the yellow ribbons used mostly recently around 2003 to support the troops overseas. The Reilly's ribbons were known as "Love for Long Island" and helped the residents of Waxham show their support everywhere they could for those affected by Sandy on October 29th.

The children presented their efforts so-far to the Babylon Rotary Club's fundraising campaign this past weekend, raising over $360 in less than a month.

Thanks from our community to the Reillys for their help!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law