.
Feedback

Carroll Freeze, Ex-Newsday Assistant, Passes Away at 80

Local Babylon resident and Mineola High School Class of 1949 member passes away.

Carroll Freeze of Babylon passed away on July 27 at her Babylon home at the age of 80.

Born Carroll Schuh on April 4, 1932, she lived in Mineola with her family, including a father who worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard and who passed away in 1945 from prostate cancer. Her mother worked in a bakery to make ends meet, choosing not to remarry. Her older sister, Eleanor Ross, passed away in 2006.

Freeze was a graduate of in 1949 before going to Packard School in Manhattan where she learned the secretarial trade and worked at an entertainment booking agency.

Freeze was married in 1955 to Harold Freeze, now 83, with whom she had two children.

After spending time as a homemaker, Freeze returned to the workplace in the 1970s as a secretary at Newsday until the 1990s and also some time as an assistant at a publishing house until 2000.

She is survived by her husband, daughter, son Scott and 7 grandchildren.

A private cremation ceremony will be held, but a memorial service will be held for friends and family at her home on August 12th.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law