.
Feedback

Robert Pasch, 91, Passes Away

Local advertising consultant, civic leader and Babylon Youth Project co-founder passed away after a respiratory condition.

Robert Pasch, a longtime Babylon Village resident and advertising counsultant, passed away on September 6th following a bout with asthma, according to Newsday.

Pasch was 91 years old.

Pasch started his career in advertising in firms such as Kenyon & Eckhardt and Ogilvy & Mather on Madison Avenue in New York City, working for well-known companies' advertising campaigns like Clearasil, Scotts Lawn and the United Nations.

He left the business in the 1970s while retiring to Babylon Village. He later became the commodore of the Babylon Yacht Club, where he had taken a family sloop to the seas often.

His advertising work helped in efforts to save the Conklin House, home of one of the village's earliest known settlers – Nathaniel Conklin. The home had fallen into disrepair during the 1980's before Pasch and other residents pursuaded the village to purhcase and restore the home in 1990.

Pasch was also a founding member of the Babylon Youth Project in January 1981, a group that works with children during afterschool hours from simple entertainment to further learning.

Pasch, a Brooklyn native, is survived by his wife, Fran, and three children and numerous grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law