.
Feedback

Talk Back: How Would You Fix LIPA?

LIPA's troubles with power restoration post-Sandy and lack of communication added to frustrations.

The Long Island Power Authority has been the target of many angry comments and rants over the past few weeks, from the average Joe consumer all the way up to Gov. Andrew Cuomo – many have lost their patience with the company.

Before Hurricane Sandy hit on October 29th, LIPA reminded Long Islanders it had prepared for Tropical Storm Irene the year before, which still rendered a portion of the island without power for many days, if not weeks.

One day after the storm hit, LIPA officials noted it could take 7 to 10 days to restore power. Before long, though, the estimates grew in many areas – some going to three weeks and even a few estimates of "around Thanksgiving."

On top of the growing frustration were a cooling air mass and a snowy nor'easter that struck a week after Sandy, leaving the powerless even colder and more miserable.

Gov. Cuomo, Suffolk County Executive Steve Bellone and other government officials promised to hold LIPA's executives – not the hard-working linesman and out-of-state workers – accountable for what they said was a poor post-storm performance by the utility. Bellone even took a unprecendeted move in controlling substations to get workers where they needed to be, skipping over LIPA's management.

Before these government officials had a chance to take too many other actions on LIPA, its chief operating officer Michael Hervey resigned.

What should be done to change or fix LIPA? Is it just executives that need to go? Is the system in need of an overhaul or just a new chain of command?

Let us know what you would do in the comments section below!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law