.
Feedback

Boater Charged in Great South Bay Crash

Suffolk Police say Brian Swezey of Babylon faces BWI changes after colliding his vessel with another Tuesday morning near Captree Island.

A 48-year-old Babylon resident has been arrested and charged with allegedly boating while intoxicated following a two-boat collision early Tuesday morning in the Great South Bay that injured six people.

Suffolk Police say was operating a 1999 Polar 21-foot center console off Captree Island at about 3:20 a.m. when the boat collided with a 1989 Steiger Craft being driven by Mario Posillico, 49, of Saltaire, Fire Island.

Posillico’s boat was also carrying Georgine Posillico, 47, also of Saltaire, a 19-year-old female, and two males, 15 and 11 years old. All the passengers on the Steiger Craft were taken to for treatment of serious injuries.

The 19-year-old woman required surgery for internal organ damage. She's expected to make a full recovery. The other passengers’ injuries included a bump to the head, medical staples for a cut on a forehead and a slight shoulder injury. Non are considered life-threatening.

Police say Swezey’s passenger, unnamed by police, was not hurt in the crash.

Swezey was issued a summons for failure to submit for a breath test, and police then obtained a warrant and took a blood test, according to the SCPD. He's being held overnight at the Third Precinct, and is scheduled to be arraigned at First District Court in Central Islip on July 16.

According to Det. Sgt. Jeffrey Walker the BWI charge is the first of the boating season in the precinct.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law