.
Feedback

No Remains Found in Latest Serial Killer Beach Search

A three-hour scrutiny of beach sites near Robert Moses Causeway Tuesday did not unearth any further human remains.

The latest search for human remains in the Gilgo Beach serial killer investigation came up empty, according to police, and no further searches along Ocean Parkway and the Robert Moses Causeway beach areas are planned.

New York State Troopers, along with members of the Suffolk County Police Department's homicide task force, spent three hours Tuesday morning reviewing specific sites near Captree Island. Aerial photographs of the barrier beach area taken using high definition cameras in April prompted the latest search.

No human remains were found, State Trooper Frank Bandiero told Patch, and there are no plans at this point for any further search activity. Suffolk Police said there are no new developments in the serial killer case or the separate investigations of the remains of four other individuals recently found in the area.

The search is part of the continuing investigation into the murders of four young women whose remains were discovered in December 2010, and a total of eight sets of remains uncovered during beach searches in the past seven months. Police have called the four women’s deaths the work of a serial killer.

It was a Suffolk County Police canine unit search on December 11, 2010, tied to the still missing Shannon Gilbert, that uncovered the remains of the first young woman, Megan Waterman, a 22-year-old Maine woman reported missing from Hauppauge in May 2010. Gilbert was last seen May 1, 2010, leaving the community of Oak Beach.

For a complete timeline regarding the serial killer case and police effort since December click here.  

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law