.
Feedback

Police Hunting Gilgo Beach Serial Killer

Suffolk Police ID the three remaining female bodies discovered at Gilgo Beach in December.

A serial killer is responsible for the deaths of four young women found on Gilgo Beach in December, said Suffolk County District Attorney Thomas Spota at a press conference today, during which police provided the identities of the last three victims.

“I believe it [the murders]  is the work of a serial killer,” said Spota, noting that the four cases were similar but declining to release any specific details on how the women were murdered,  except to say they were killed elsewhere and dumped at the Gilgo Beach location.

One identified is Amber Lynn Costello, a 27-year-old North Babylon woman last seen in early September. Maureen Brainard-Barnes, 25, of Norwich, Connecticut, and Melissa Barthelemy, 24, of Erie County, New York, were also identified. Last week the first female remains were identified as Megan Waterman, a missing 24-year-old Maine woman who was last seen in Hauppauge.

All four women were prostitutes who used online services, such as Craiglists, for business, said Spota.

Police are now offering a $5,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of the Gilgo Beach serial killer and asking the public's help in solving the crimes.

“We are asking anyone involved in this [prostitution] business, the business these women were in, to come forward and provide information,” said Spota. “We hope people come forward as they must have some information, no matter how insignificant they might think it is, that can help solve these cases.”

Costello, a 5’0 blonde with hazel eyes, was last seen in North Babylon on September 2, say police, and no official missing persons report had been filed about her disappearance.  Brainard-Barnes was last seen in New York City in July, 2007. Barthelemy was last seen in July, 2009 in the Bronx.

“All these girls are victims of a homicide and they worked in a high-risk business,” said Spota.

Police say the women were killed at different times and disposed of at different times, but refused to provide any further details. They declined to state if there are any suspects or persons of interest at this point.

Shortly after the first remains were found on December 13 police talked to a West Islip man who authorities said had used the services of another Craiglist escort, Shannan Gilbert, a 24-year-old New Jersey woman who was reported missing in May.

Police say Gilbert was last seen after being driven by a man to meet a client in Oak Beach. However, Gilbert was quickly ruled out as one of the bodies by the Suffolk County Medical Examiner. There is no update on that case, Dormer said on Monday.

Dormer said the final three identifications had been made Friday by the New York Medical Examiner’s office and families had been notified over the weekend.

The commissioner said police will resume searching the Ocean Beach Parkway area this spring even though it did a thorough search back in December.

“Our heart-felt condolences go out to  the families,” said Dormer, who asked anyone with information to contact the Homicide Squad at 631-852-6392 or Crime Stoppers at 1-800-220-TIPS. All calls will be kept confidential.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law