.
Feedback

Police: No Comment on Whether Manorville Body is Tied to Gilgo Serial Killer Case

The discovery of a body Wednesday is under investigation by homicide and county medical examiner.

Suffolk Police are investigating the discovery of a body in a wooded area in Manorville and the gender is yet undetermined, according to police.

The body was reported by a jogger on Wednesday. Homicide detectives are investigating and were not available late Wednesday night to answer questions regarding whether it may be related to the Gilgo serial killer investigation that is ongoing, according to the police information office.

Police are continuing the two-year investigation of the Gilgo serial killer case, which includes remains found strewn between the barrier beach and Manorville over the period of nearly two decades. There are at least 10 victims in the case and county law enforcement is divided over whether the killings are the work of one killer or more than one killer.

The body discovered today was found in Manorville Hills County Park in Manorville. 

According to police, the scene is being processed by homicide squad detectives and personnel from the Suffolk County Crime Lab and the Office of the Suffolk County Medical Examiner. '

An autopsy will be performed, said police.

Last month a body was found in Manorville and police declined at that time to comment on whether the remains found a quarter of a mile west of Wading River Road were tied to Gilgo serial killer investigation.

The Suffolk County Police Information Office instituted a no-comment on the serial killer case shortly after county leadership brought in a new police commissioner in January.

In late 2011 former Police Commissioner Richard Dormer stood by his initial statement in 2011 that the killings of 10 victims was the work of one person while current Suffolk County District Attorney Thomas Spota went on record later in the year stating he believed the murders were the work of more than one killer.

During 2011 two Gilgo victims’ body parts were found a short distance from the Wading River Road site.

One is an unidentified woman tagged as Jane Doe No. 6 whose torso and left foot were found first in Manorville in 2000 and whose head, hands and right foot were found Gilgo in April, 2011. The victim was an adult white woman between the ages of 18 and 40 and stood about 5 foot 2 inches. A medical examiner database report states the victim’s right and left nasal bones had been fractured and healed. Police have stated the victim had a tattoo on her right ankle but the database report does not indicate that.

The partial remains of Jessica Taylor were found in Manorville in 2003 and her head was found in Gilgo Beach in 2011.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law