.
Feedback

W. Babylon Man Charged with Stealing $35K From Church

Nassau DA alleges Derrick Campbell stole $35,000 from a Bethpage-area church.

A West Babylon man has been arrested and charged with Grand Larceny after the Nassau County District Attorney alleged he stole over $35,000 from a Bethpage church.

Derrick Campbell, 43, of West Babylon, was placed under arrest this morning by investigators after Nassau County DA Kathleen Rice alleged he stole $35,000 between June 2008 and May 2011 from East Meadow Church of Christ in Bethpage. Campbell had been serving as the church's volunteer treasurer.

Rice said Campbell allegedly issued a loan repayment to himself despite no such loan existing. The church's board of trustees referred the matter to the DA's office last August after Campbell told them he had stolen the money.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone everyday with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

“Mr. Campbell was trusted with a position of responsibility in the church, but he violated the trust of every parishioner who thought that their donations were being used for the betterment of the church and its community,” Rice said in a statement. “He did everything he could to cover his tracks, but today’s arrest was inevitable when he forged that first check.”

Campbell was charged with Grand Larceny in the Third Degree and Possession of a Forged Instrument in the Second Degree. He could face up to seven years in prision if convicted and will be arraigned today in First District Court in Hempstead.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law