.
Feedback

Half of Great South Bay Reopens for Shellfishing

DEC reopens part of Great South Bay nearly a full-month after Hurricane Sandy churned up the shoreline.

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has reopened the Great South Bay and all tributaries to shellfishing after Hurricane Sandy caused the organization to temporarily close the area.

The emergency shellfishing closures have been in effect since Monday, October 29th, the day Hurricane Sandy made her way across our area knocking out power and bringing flood waters up to eight feet on shore.

Shellfishing was closed to protect public health, according to a release by the DEC. The areas being reopened have passed bacteriological examinations of water samples for possible contaminants.

In the Town of Babylon and Town of Islip, all areas of the Great South Bay east of Bergen Point to the State Boat Channel on Jones Island have been reopened for shellfishing as Tuesday.

Areas lying west of those areas, however, including those in the Great South Bay remain closed for shellfishing until further notice from the DEC.

More information on the closures island-wide can be found at the DEC's website.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law