.
Feedback

Leg. Horsley Spearheading Operation Sandy

Horsley aims to bring food, clothing and supplies to Lindenhurst and Babylon Town.

Legislator Wayne Horsley (D–Babylon) will be sponsoring a food, clothing and supply collection drive starting today at his district office in Lindenhurst.

“Lindenhurst Village and Babylon Town were among those areas hardest hit by Sandy," said Horsley in a release. "Many residents in my district have lost their homes or are going without power or heat. I am calling on the community to help our neighbors by donating non-perishable food items, gently used clothing and basic supplies to our residents impacted by the storm.” 

Materials and supplies can be dropped off at Horsley's office at 123 North Wellwood Avenue in Lindenhurst all week long from 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.

Horlsey suggested the following items be collected: Ready-to-eat, non-perishable foods, cereal bars, cereal, Carnation instant breakfast, canned fruit, peanut butter, jelly, bread items, tuna, nuts, juice boxes, iced tea, water and baby food, diapers, etc. Gift cards to local restaurants or drug stores are also welcome. In addition, batteries, blankets, flashlights, hand sanitizer, cleaning supplies, and school supplies as well as paper goods such as plates, cups, utensils, napkins, paper towels and trash bags are also needed.  We are also asking for blankets, pillows, and air mattresses. 

Our Lady of Perpetual Help Church in Lindenhurst will serve as a distribution point for the collected items. The church will be open Monday through Friday from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 3 p.m. to 6 p.m.

“Restorations will take time," Horsley said.  "Together we can help each other through this crisis. I ask those of you who are able, to contribute to this effort to help ease the stress and hardship our neighbors are facing."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law