.
Feedback

LIRR: We're Sorry for Service Snafu

The agency issues a public apology after Thursday's signal outage stranded commuters.

For the second time in the Long Island Rail Road is for a major that stranded passengers at Penn Station, at branch stations and on trains Thursday evening.

The MTA said a lightning strike early evening knocked a signal system west of Jamaica out of commission, and that crews worked overnight and into Friday morning to restore it. The LIRR ran all but four normal rush hour trains Friday and said Friday's evening should be “normal.”

“The LIRR apologizes for the service suspension last night that left many of our customers without a regular means of getting home and that stranded some passengers on trains between stations,” said the agency in a public statement on its website posted Friday afternoon.

It stated that it's launched a full review of both the service and communications and the underlying failure of the Jamaica signal system network.

“We're working closely on identifying the root causes of the malfunctions with Ansaldo, the designer of the newly installed micro-processing switch and signal equipment. In addition, the LIRR's retaining an outside consultant, Systra, to help in the review process, including the system's protection, diagnostics and back-up systems,” said the LIRR.

After the strike damaged the primary and back-up signal systems, workers began manually setting switches. Meanwhile, the initiated a service diversion plan, advising customers to take the E train from Penn Station to Jamaica. New York City Transit Authority cross-honored tickets.

However, just after many customers had reached Jamaica via the subway and boarded eastbound trains, the "Hall" signal location east of Jamaica, which is part of the complete Jamaica signal network, then failed, causing a full suspension of service. Some standing trains were unable to safely move in either direction because of the second signal system failure. It was a while before service was restored eastbound.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law