.
Feedback

Local Officials and Residents React to Sewer Feasibility Findings

Government leaders press study needed to be done to "even begin the conversation."

The Suffolk County Department of Public Works in its continued Sewer Feasability Study for the areas of Deer Park, North Babylon, West Babylon, West Islip and Wyandanch, including the revelation of an estimated cost of over $2 billion and construction time of until at least 2021.

Both officials and some local residents had things to say following the results at the meeting.

"First thing I recogonize is when we do these reports, it scares the pudding out of us," said Legislator Wayne Horsley (R–Lindenhurst), which got a chuckle out of a packed house of over 100 people. "We're trying several things here on the country level... I know this is scary stuff, but we have to go through these steps so we can move the ball forward."

He added: "We're playing some of this by ear, to be frank."

"I passed the original bill to do this study," said Legislator Lou D'Amaro (D–North Babylon). "We're getting info we need to see if this makes sense. We are not here to impose this on you."

D'Amaro added: "We can tell you what the benefits are to this... but this is very preliminary, what we're showing. If we don't take these steps, we can't even begin the discussion."

One of the most outspoken speakers was Matt Groh, a North Babylon resident who ran for Babylon Town Council last Fall. He said his concerns were over whether or not the plans would allow for those in each district subarea to be allowed to choose whether they hook up to the system or not.

"Some sources were not up there for funding this either," he noted. "What about a quarter-cent sales tax? We should use that to cover the sewers." Among his other suggestions was a Capital Improvement Fund to help shave off some of the estimate $2 billion to be spent on the project.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law