.
Feedback

Owen Johnson's Seagrass Protection Act Passes State Senate

The new Seagrass Protection Act will allow regulation of seagrass management areas.

The New York state Senate has passed legislation to protect marine habitat and the continued viability of commercial and recreational fishing. The bill was sent to the Assembly, and has been returned with changes to the Senate for final approval.

The bill - sponsored by Senator Owen Johnson (R-C, Babylon) -  establishes the Seagrass Protection Act to address threats to seagrasses, an ecologically important species.

The bill grants the NYS Deparment of Environmental Conservation authority to:

  • Designate seagrass management areas.
  • Restrict the types of mechanically powered fishing gear in seagrass areas that could be harmful to the grass.
  • Make this information available on the DEC website.
  • Develop and adopt, after consultation with stakeholders, a seagrass management plan for designated seagrass management areas to protect seagrass beds and preserve traditional recreational activities.

The Great South Bay is home to a type of seagrass called eelgrass, an important component of a healthy estuary system.

"The passage of this legislation is great news for Long Island. Seagrasses are vital to the health of our bays, providing a habitat for many valuable species of fish and shellfish, as well as stabilizing the bay bottom sediments,” Senator Owen H. Johnson said in a statement on his website.

“The once vast seagrass meadows have suffered dramatic declines making it essential we take action now to protect the seagrasses in our coastal regions,”  he continued.

Senator Johnson concluded, “I'm proud to sponsor this legislation calling for the protection, maintenance and regrowth of seagrass, which will ultimately improve the quality of the environment and the fisheries on Long Island.”

According to a report prepared by the DEC, "New York seagrass beds function as vital habitat and nursery grounds for numerous commercially, recreationally and ecologically important fish and shellfish species. Seagrasses also serve a major role in the nutrient and carbon cycles, provide an important food source for fish and waterfowl, and stabilize bottom sediments.

"Aside from providing many essential and invaluable ecosystem services, their presence is often used as an indicator of estuarine health and quality. While historic seagrass acreage in New York has not been documented, historic photography and records indicate that there may have been 200,000 acres in 1930; today, only 21,803 acres remain."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law