.
Feedback

Representatives, Residents Alarmed by Sewer Expansion Cost

The Suffolk County Department of Public Works held its third sewer expansion meeting on Wednesday.

The Suffolk County Department of Public Works helds it third, and final, public meeting on the Southwest Sewer District Service Area Expansion Project, reviewing its findings from its final review.

Representatives from the SCDPW said the most feasible and cost effective idea was to work on funding a project to areas in most need, many of which have a low watertable where backed up sewage from cesspools could contaiminate the single groundwater aquifer for Long Island.

A single area of North Babylon, coded 108-2 by the SCDPW, would be considered the single top subarea to receive sewers in the near future. A presentation stated a random home picked in the area with a home value of $392,500 and 3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms in a split-level would expect to pay an additional $1,319 a year to an estimate $600 maitinence fees on current cesspools if the plan went through under a "best-case scenario."

The "best case" plan would be, according to representatives, a 30-year bond at 2% interest and 80% of the project's funding from federal, state or local sources. A previous meeting stated the cost for the project could range from $900 million to over $2 billion.

Local representatives and residents both noted the increase in taxes would not be doable for those living in the area.

"The jawdrop was understandable," said Legislator Wayne Horsley (D–Babylon), noting the reaction to the cost estimates at the last meeting. "Times are tough. We have been, as a county, we have been looking for alternative ways to fund this. We're working with Executive Bellone and fellow legislators. The idea right now is only half cooked – we're looking to see what synergies there can be between Suffolk County and Suffolk Water Authority."

"If we don’t get the funding, we just don’t go forward," said Legislator Lou D'Amaro (D–North Babylon). "Suffolk County wont pay for it. Without 80% funding, I dont see how this goes foward."

Residents were concerned the meetings would go ahead with making the sewer a reality, however, a referendum would have to be held for the areas selected. The residents in theses area will have a final say by voting on whether their area receives the sewer system expansion.

"You wont get a sewer system without a say," promised D'Amaro. "Not while I’m sitting here."

 "My hope is by next year we should have some positive results coming from meetings in finding a way to make this doable," said Horsley. "$2 billion is not doable and we all know it. If we can find a better funding source to manage this, we may have a good shot."

He added: "This can be done – there is an answer."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law