.
Feedback

Town Board Approves $300K for Sandy Repairs

Babylon Town Board signed off on the first of its $22.5 million worth of contracts to repair town beaches, parks and docks.

The Babylon Town Board has started the revitalization process after signing off on $300,000 worth of contracts to help rebuild town beaches, docks and parks hit hard by Hurricane Sandy in October.

Newsday reports construction will start by the end of January and three local construction firms have until Thursday to prepare design documents for their projects. Town officials set an ambitious "before Memorial Day" deadline for the repairs to be completed.

Patch reported the Town Board had approved a total amount of $22.5 million to help with the repair processes throughout the Town of Babylon. Areas closest to the shoreline, especially beachfronts such as Overlook and Gilgo Beach and Tanner Park, saw extensive damage during the October hurricane.

"We're hoping to get as much back from FEMA as we can," town spokesman Kevin Bonner told Newsday.

Town Councilman Tony Martinez told Newsday that the repairs to Overlook Beach alone could cost upwards of $6 million. Martinez also said the town may look to rebuild some structures to withstand another storm like Sandy.

"We've got to prepare for the next one," Martinez said to Newsday.

Cashin Associaties, a Hauppauge-based company, could earn a total of $141,524 for planning the repairs to Cedar Beach Marina and Overlook Beach, as well as the dredging at Venetian Shores Park in West Babylon and repairing a town marina in Copiague.

Savlik & Murray, a Ronkonkoma company, will earn $130,604 for repairs to Tanner Park Marina while Mineola-based Sidney B. Bowne & Son will earn $30,000 for repairs to the Tanner Park electrical system.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law