.
Feedback

Town Board to Discuss Garbage Contract in Light of Arrests

Special meeting will be held on Tuesday, Sept. 4.

The Babylon Town Board will hold a special meeting next Tuesday to determine how to proceed in regard to a residential garbage collection with Jody Enterprises. 

The meeting comes on the heels of the arrest of two men, whom officials said worked as managers for Jody and were involved in a recycling scheme that involved hauling recyclables meant for the Town of Smithtown's recycling facility to a salvage business in West Babylon, where they are alleged to have sold them for personal profit. 

The Town Board passed a resolution awarding a 10-year trash collecting contract to Jody Enterprises of Babylon Inc. in June, but Town Supervisor Rich Schaffer never it after hearing of an investigation of the company from the Suffolk County District Attorney's Office. 

"The Town Board has requested the presence of Jody Enterprises to answer some questions as part of the process of determining the best course of action moving forward," Town spokesman Tim Ruggeri told Patch in an email, of the meeting to be held at 9 a.m. at Babylon Town Hall. 

Schaffer said last week that he will ask the Town Board to declare an emergency, which would allow it to enter into a short-term emergency procurement with another residential trash collector. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law