.
Feedback

Village's Holiday Festivities Will Go On As Planned

Mayor says the festivities will give the village some sense of a return to normalcy.

Hurricane Sandy did major damage, but Babylon Village will not lose its holiday cheer due to the storm this season. The village plans to go forward with all 2012 holiday festivities.

The move was first announced at Tuesday evening's village board meeting by Mayor Ralph Scordino, who said it was a time to band together and set an example for our youngest citizens. Scordino and the village also posted his thoughts on the village's website on Wednesday.

"It is important for us to move forward and continue with our activities... I think it is very important for our children to see that life goes on," Scordino told those in attendance on Tuesday.

Scordino said during the meeting many residents asked whether village-sponsored holiday events such as the tree lighting might be cancelled because so many lost so much.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone everyday with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

"I have discussed this issue with the board and other community members and feel that it is important for us to move forward and continue with our activities," he said. "We are cleaning up and rebuilding and we need some normalcy and festivity in our lives."

Scordino noted other organizations throughout the community had yet to make up there minds, but the Village Beautification Society lamppost decorating on November 25th, Chamber of Commerce's Old Fashioned Night of Shopping and Conklin House festivities on November 30th tree lighting on December 2nd were all still on as planned.

"Babylon Village proved that we can all band together and help our neighbors during a crisis," said Scordino. "We need to band together for something festive as well."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law