.
Feedback

W. Babylon Man Charged for Overfishing, Attempted Sale

Fishermen aimed to sell expensive blackfish after going over their quota.

The New York State Department of Conservation announced two individuals, including a West Babylon man, were charged for attempting to sell 150 blackfish to a Queens-based wholesale food dealer. A third person, the dealer, was also charged for attempting to purchase the fish.

The DEC's Environmental Conservation Officers (ECOs) pressed charges on November 11th as fishermen Matthew Ervolino, 34, of West Babylon, and Matthew Savarese, 36, of Holbrook, began weighing the fish. The two were expecting to exchange money with dealer Ding Hai Yen, of New Harbor Food in Flushing, for the sale of 150 blackfish, weighing a total 382 pounds.

The ECOs observed the fishing pair for about two weeks before making the arrest in November at a West Islip residence where the fish were being kept in pens before their sale to the New York City market.

The blackfish would have a $2,000 value on the black market, according to the DEC.

Let Patch save you time – get the top stories of the day delivered to your inbox by subscribing to our newsletter, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter for the latest breaking news in Babylon.

“DEC establishes recreational fishing limits so individuals can enjoy a fishing resource at a sustainable level,” said DEC Region 1 Regional Director Peter Scully in a statement. “When individuals drastically overfish their recreational limit and then attempt to sell these fish, they are not only depleting the fishing stock, but taking advantage of commercial fisherman who are playing by the rules and harvesting fish at their quota limits.”

Ervolino and Saverese were each charged with unlawful possession and sale of the blackfish, selling without a commercial food license and possession over the limit and undersized blackfish – each a misdemeanor under the Environmental Conservation Law. The charges can carry fines up to $5,000 each and/or one year in jail.

Yen, 56, was charged with purchasing fish from an unlicensed fisherman, a misdemeanor carrying a fine of $5,000 and/or one year in jail.

The fish were seized as evidence and, later, donated to the Bethany Soup Kitchen in Westbury.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law