.
Feedback

All HS Sports, Including Playoffs, Postponed

The directors of both county's high school sports associations agree to a postponement of one week.

High school sports may not be high up on the list of important things following the destruction brought on by Hurricane Sandy, but it was a lingering questions among many athletic directors throughout Long Island after schools were closed for nearly a week in many districts.

After a Thursday meeting of athletic directors, all Nassau and Suffolk County high school sporting events have been postponed until next week at the earliest, according to a report by Newsday

The schedule for this weekend alone included 32 first-round playoff games between the two counties, some of which were to be hosted in hard-hit areas such as Babylon Village, Baldwin, Lawrence and Riverhead.

Nina Van Erk, executive director of Section VIII, Nassau's governing body for sports, and Ed Cinelli, executive director of Suffolk's Section XI, told Newsday that no new dates, times or sites had been finalized nor were the rescheduled events set in stone.

The current rescheduling pushes football quarterfinal matchups back a week, as of right now, and the Long Island Championships to the weekend of November 30th through December 2nd. This will be the first time since 2001 the championships have not been played on Thanksgiving weekend.

The CHSFL, in charge of league sporting events for the Island's private and/or Catholic schools, already cancelled their events for this weekend as well and have not announced plans for the playing of those games. St. Anthony's athletic Director Don Buckley said just one Catholic high school currently has power, St. John the Baptist.

Playoff games for other sports, including soccer and field hockey, have also been pushed back.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law