.
Feedback

Students Learn a Lesson on Anti-Bullying

A Suffolk County Police Officer visited Babylon students earlier this week to give them a lesson on bullying.

Suffolk County Police Department Officer George Lynagh paid a visit to Babylon Memorial Grade School this week to teach students an important anti-bullying lesson.

Officer Lynagh, who works with the Suffolk County Police Department’s Community Outreach Bureau, wanted the students to remember that since there are many different types of bullying – including emotional, verbal and physical – it's important to watch for the early signs of it. Lynagh’s lesson came at a crucial time, as student bullying is one of the most frequently reported discipline problems in schools across the country.

According to a recent report from the National Education Association, 21 percent of elementary schools, 43 percent of middle schools and 22 percent of high schools reported problems with bullying over the past decade. Due to Lynagh’s fantastic school outreach efforts, Babylon is bucking the national trend when it comes to bullying.

"We teach from a police officer’s point of view, and we talk a lot about consequences, both of bullying and Internet use,” Lynagh said. "It's a school resource officer program. It reaches from the elementary school all the way up to the high school level.”

Babylon Memorial Grade School Principal Randee Bonagura makes it a point to invite Lynagh back to the school each year, and she is extremely pleased with the difference his message brings. Lynagh’s visits reinforce the school-community partnership as an extension of the district’s character education program.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Babylon Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Adam Crowley May 15, 2013 at 06:53 pm
As I explained, my post was made on behalf of another village resident. However, I did take theRead More time to read the statute and do have an independent viewpoint on this subject. While I do not feel that all dogs require a muzzle at all times, if you have a dog that you know to be a threat to other dogs or humans, you would have a duty to take measures to eliminate that threat before bring that dog into public. If that measure is a muzzle, then that's what must be done. As my post indicated, I believe strict enforcement would be exceedingly difficult and, perhaps, unnecessary (at least with respect to the muzzle requirement). However, a total lack of enforcement is dangerous and unacceptable. I think a little common sense goes a long way and I have confidence that those charged with enforcing the Village code could do so selectively. I understand that selective enforcement may be a concept that many feel uncomfortable with. However, just because the law requires a muzzle, that is hardly a reason to disregard it in its entirety and allow dogs with vicious propensities to roam around unleashed. I will leave it up to Village lawmakers to remove the muzzle requirement (and suggest that they do so) if that is what it would take to make people comfortable with the leash requirement.
Concerned Citizen May 15, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Did you read the law? unless it be properly muzzled and effectively restrained by a chain or leashRead More I'll bet neither dog was muzzled Do you really want them to enforce this law